IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printe

RE: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?

From: Carl-Uno Manros (carl@manros.com)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 00:56:42 EST

Next message: Herriot, Robert: "IPP>NOT latest notify poll document"

Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> New I-D for LDAP Printer Schema [.pdf down-loaded]"
In reply to: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site t he SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tom,

I suggest not.

If we want to reference them I think a better place for the reference would
be in the IPP/1.1 Model & Semantics document where we have a Directory
section. Maybe we can add that as an informational reference before it get
published as RFC.

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipp@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org]On Behalf Of Hastings,
> Tom N
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 6:17 PM
> To: ipp
> Subject: IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to
> site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?
>
>
> Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition in the "Job and Printer
> Set operation spec to site the SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?
>
> If so, I need the complete references to them.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>

Next message: Herriot, Robert: "IPP>NOT latest notify poll document"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> New I-D for LDAP Printer Schema [.pdf down-loaded]"
In reply to: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> OPS - Do we want the "printer-xri-supported" definition to site t he SLP or LDPA directory schema or not?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2000 - 00:58:02 EST