IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> FW: FW: ADM - Questions on Backwards Compatibility betwe en IPP/1. 0 an d IPP/1.1

Re: IPP> FW: FW: ADM - Questions on Backwards Compatibility betwe en IPP/1. 0 an d IPP/1.1

Keith Moore (moore@cs.utk.edu)
Mon, 17 May 1999 14:13:40 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> FW: FW: ADM - Questions on Backwards Compatibility betwe"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> FW: FW: ADM - Questions on Backwards Compatibility betwe"

> Is this a "normative" reference or not?

SHOULD is a normative reference.

Requesting a variance is the easiest way to fix this.
The variance procedure is documented in RFC 2026, section 9.1.

Keith

Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> FW: FW: ADM - Questions on Backwards Compatibility betwe"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> FW: FW: ADM - Questions on Backwards Compatibility betwe"