IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication

Re: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication

Keith Moore (moore@cs.utk.edu)
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:29:11 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: PETER_E_MELLQUIST@hp-roseville-om3.om.hp.com: "Re: IPP> Security in 1.1"
Previous message: Manros, Carl-Uno B: "RE: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication"
Next in thread: SHIVAUN_ALBRIGHT@HP-Roseville-om2.om.hp.com: "RE: Re: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication"

> In our discussion we are referencing the need to authenticate
> the message body. I didn't think this was part of Keith's request.

no, I don't really think that integrity protection on the message
body should be required of all IPP implementations.

Keith

Next message: PETER_E_MELLQUIST@hp-roseville-om3.om.hp.com: "Re: IPP> Security in 1.1"
Previous message: Manros, Carl-Uno B: "RE: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication"
Next in thread: SHIVAUN_ALBRIGHT@HP-Roseville-om2.om.hp.com: "RE: Re: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication"