Sorry,
Tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 11:34
> To: 'ipp'
> Subject: MOD - Updated IPP/1.1 Model with AGREED Issue resolutions
> from BakeOff2 for Wed telecon
>
> For discussion on the DL and tomorrow's telecon, Wed, 4/7, 10-12 PDT (1-3
> EDT):
>
> The updated IPP/1.1 Model and Semantics document is available with
> revision marks at:
>
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_MOD/ipp-model-v11-990406-rev.doc
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_MOD/ipp-model-v11-990406-rev.pdf
>
> with the proposed resolutions to the issues from the Bake Off 2.
>
> This is an intermediate draft. We will be reviewing it on the
> distribution list and at the New Orleans meeting next week. The next
> Internet-Draft will be sent after the Last Call period ends at the end of
> April.
>
> The change history and Differences from IPP/1.0 has not yet been updated.
>
> Also we have not attempted to include the IPP/1.0 text, so that the
> IPP/1.1 document defined both IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1 as agreed at the IETF
> meeting in March.
>
> All issues 1-31 have proposed text except the following still OPEN issues:
>
> 2) ISSUE: How can client force identified (authenticated) mode?
> 17) ISSUE: Client display of absolute time for job attributes?
> 30) ISSUE: Should "job-state-reasons" and "printer-state-reasons" be
> MUST in IPP/1.1?
> 31) ISSUE: How indicate a ripped job that is waiting for the marker?
>
>
> The following proposed issue resolutions only affect the Implementer's
> Guide; they do not affect the Model and Semantics document:
>
> 7) ISSUE: Please implement Manufacturer make and model printer attribute
> and send the .INF file model name of the printer.
> 10) ISSUE: How distinguish between submit vs processing auto-sense?
> 16) ISSUE: Get-Printer-Attributes Polling
> 22) ISSUE: Status code on variable-length attributes that are 'too
> short'
>
>