IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Re: MOD - Confusion about image/tiff MIME Content

RE: IPP> Re: MOD - Confusion about image/tiff MIME Content

Richard Shockey (rshockey@ix.netcom.com)
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 18:00:14 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> MOD - Ok to add 'image/tiff' and 'application/pdf' to IP"
Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> Should we add image/tiff ;application=faxbw and ;application=faxc"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> Re: MOD - Confusion about image/tiff MIME Content Type"

At 03:45 PM 2/19/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>Jim,
>
>The current IPP/1.1 I-D Model and Semantics draft has examples for
>mimeMediaTypes to show some useful parameters for 'text/plain' so that
>people get the idea about parameters on media types.
>
>Should we add the faxbw and faxcolor parameters as examples to 'image/tiff'?

YES ... consistency with the IANA registration is strongly advised. I see
no reason it would complicate things.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63119
Voice 314.918.9020
Fax 314.918.9015
INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey@ix.netcom.com
eFAX 815.333.1237
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> MOD - Ok to add 'image/tiff' and 'application/pdf' to IP"
Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "IPP> Should we add image/tiff ;application=faxbw and ;application=faxc"
Previous message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> Re: MOD - Confusion about image/tiff MIME Content Type"