I think that we have discussed this and other similar attributes before and
concluded that the wording needed to be that the error for a bad syntax type
was "client-error-bad-request" and thus different from the error for a
value with the correct syntax type but too long The error for the second
case is 'client-error-request-value-too-long'.
Bob Herriot
At 09:24 AM 11/18/98 , Carl Kugler wrote:
>I don't think this is right:
>
>job-hold-until (type3 keyword | name)
> IF NOT a single 'keyword' or 'name' value with a length less than or equal
to 255 octets, REJECT/RETURN 'client-error-request-value-too-long'.
>
>Suppose the object receives a request containing a "job-hold-until" attribute
containing a 'text' value one octet long. The object returns
'client-error-request-value-too-long'? Intuitively, that doesn't seem right,
since the request is not too long.
>
>This problem repeats itself in other tests in the guide that combine syntax
and length checks in the predicate.
>
> -Carl
>
>-----
>See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4900
>
--=====================_1113120682==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
I think that we have discussed this and other similar
attributes before and
--=====================_1113120682==_.ALT--
concluded that the wording needed to be that the error for a bad syntax
type
was "client-error-bad-request" and thus different from
the error for a
value with the correct syntax type but too long The error for the second
case is 'client-error-request-value-too-long'.
Bob Herriot
At 09:24 AM 11/18/98 , Carl Kugler wrote:
>I don't think this is right:
>
>job-hold-until (type3 keyword | name)
> IF NOT a single 'keyword' or 'name' value with a length less
than or equal to 255 octets, REJECT/RETURN
'client-error-request-value-too-long'.
>
>Suppose the object receives a request containing a
"job-hold-until" attribute containing a 'text' value one octet
long. The object returns
'client-error-request-value-too-long'? Intuitively, that doesn't
seem right, since the request is not too long.
>
>This problem repeats itself in other tests in the guide that combine
syntax and length checks in the predicate.
>
> -Carl
>
>-----
>See the original message at
http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4900
>