>From the way I read this, there is an alternative to having a real-tim=
e
>clock in each fax machine. The rule is that the required time stamp is=
the
>date and time the transmission is *sent* (not received) so this implie=
s the
>sender could pass a time stamp with the job rather than the printer
>generating one.
It appears the need for a clock in every fax machine is due to the scan=
nature,
not the print nature, of the machine. I don't see why IPP would change =
this
from
a device perspective.
Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
=