IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> IFF "status message" question

Re: IPP> IFF "status message" question

Carl Kugler (kugler@us.ibm.com)
28 Aug 1998 14:54:58 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Moore: "RE: IPP> PLEASE fix this list!"
Previous message: lawrence@agranat.com: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Hugo Parra: "IPP> IFF "status message" question"

Section 14 (Appendix B) of the "Model and Semantics" document includes the =
> following:
> "The name of the enum is the suggested status message for US English"
>
> The name of the enum for unqualified success (0x0000) is 'successful-ok'. =
> Shouldn't its corresponding status message be "successful-ok"? If so, =
> there is another discrepancy in Appendix A of the "Encoding and Transport" =
> document where "OK" is used as the status-message for 'successful-ok'.
>
> -Hugo Parra
>

Also, isn't "successful-ok" redundant? We could save a few bytes and shorten that to "successful" without losing any information. Similarly with "successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes" and "successful-ok-conflicting-attributes".

-Carl

-----
Original Message: http://www.findmail.com/list/ipp/?start=4393
Start a FREE email list at http://www.FindMail.com/

Next message: Paul Moore: "RE: IPP> PLEASE fix this list!"
Previous message: lawrence@agranat.com: "(no subject)"
In reply to: Hugo Parra: "IPP> IFF "status message" question"