IPP Mail Archive: IPP> IETF Process

IPP> IETF Process

don@lexmark.com
Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:00:49 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jeff Schnitzer: "IPP> IETF Process"
Previous message: Carl Kugler: "RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme"

What is the process for confirming consensus after substantial changes have
been made to a standard? In the IEEE and other recognized standards
bodies, if non-editoral changes are made, the final version is
re-ballotted. Considering the substantial changes made since the WG had
consensus in and shortly after the January meeting in Maui, once we have
updated all the document with what we believe to be the last changes (i.e.
before IESG approval), I believe we should make sure the WG is still in
consensus.

Thoughts??

**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************

Next message: Jeff Schnitzer: "IPP> IETF Process"
Previous message: Carl Kugler: "RE: IPP> Re: New IPP Scheme"