IF you ARE talking about the necesity of developing specialized =
internet
print clients (as opposed to a java client that loads from a web page =
or
some-such), then it seems to me that you would want to settle on a =
scheme
such as "printto:" or "printer:" which would in fact call up a seperate
client.
How are most of you planning on this being implemented? (do you really =
want
to trust your printer's interface to the MS/Netscape war?)
Original Message:=20
_____ =20
From: Paul Moore [mailto:paulmo@microsoft.com]
You misunderstand my suggestion. I mean that printto: is like
mailto: - it
loads a client and passes in the destination address. It has nothing
to do
with the protocol that gets used to send the print.=20
As always, in HIS hands,
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Joel H. Bennett
<mailto:Joel.Bennett@usa.xerox.com>=20
<http://jbennett.home.ml.org/> =20
_____ =20
QOTD:=20
Dictatorship (n): a form of government under which everything which is
not prohibited is compulsory.=20
_____ =20