I am IN favor of you recruiting different people to respond to helping
address the issues of security and scheme problems. This ratification
process has taken a VERY long time and any knowledge that may help speed
up the process would be welcome.
I am also interested in hearing the final opinion (concerns and
compliments) of IESG regarding the latest IPP proposals.
Kris Schoff
Hewlett-Packard
>
> My proposal:
>
> The IPP documents will not be approved as a Proposed Standard until
> they are fixed to use ipp: URLs instead of http: URLs.
>
> With an eye toward making them acceptable to IESG while addressing
> the IPP group's concerns:
>
> - I will recruit a team of experts from the HTTP working group
> and ask them to quickly review the ipp: scheme proposal for potential
> interoperability problems with proxies.
>
> - I will recruit experts from the web and TLS communities to design
> appropriate URL parameters for use with TLS, which can be shared
> by other URL schemes besides ipp:.
>
> The IPP documents have been submitted for IESG ballot, and may be
> on IESG's agenda for discussion as early as July 16th. I would
> therefore like a decision from IPP by July 15th as to whether
> the IPP working group is willing to pursue this course of action.
>
> Note that there may still be other IESG concerns with this protocol,
> particularly on security. We won't know about those until the IESG
> finishes its ballot.
>
> Keith