IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?

RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?

Carl-Uno Manros (manros@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Mon, 6 Jul 1998 08:53:16 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Moore: "RE: IPP> clarification needed re: "ipp:" proposal"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?"

At 08:42 AM 7/6/98 PDT, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> Based on more recent discussions in the WG, I do not see a major difference
>> whether I write:
>>
>> PRINTER: ipp://www.manros.com/ipp-printer
>>
>> or
>>
>> PRINTER: http://www.manros.com/ipp-printer
>>
>> the same way as you use telephone numbers for both TEL: and FAX: on you
>> cards today.
>
>The former would imply the IPP port, while the latter would imply
>port 80.
>
>The port used is a major difference.
>
>Larry
>--
>http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter <--- NOT MY PRINTER
>

Larry,

You are right the examples should have been:

PRINTER: ipp://www.manros.com/ipp-printer

or

PRINTER: http://www.manros.com:631/ipp-printer

but I still do not think that the difference is that big.

Carl-Uno

Carl-Uno Manros
Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com

Next message: Paul Moore: "RE: IPP> clarification needed re: "ipp:" proposal"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "RE: IPP> The impact on users for "ipp:" URL notation?"