IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme

RE: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Wed, 17 Jun 1998 12:52:58 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: IPP> ADM - Results from the IPP Phone Conference 980617"
Previous message: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> ADM - Results from the IPP Phone Conference 980617"

> In response to Randy's post ...
>
> POST http://myhost.com:374/myprinter/myqueue HTTP/1.1
> Host: myproxy.com:374
> Content-type: application/ipp
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
>
> <RKD> Why would the Host line have the 374 port?

Please see section 14.23 ("Host") of draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03.txt
which lays out the requirements and conditions more clearly.

> 3. A full IPP URL (e.g., ipp://myhost.com/myprinter/myqueue)
>
> <RKD> I don't understand why this would be required. If it
> <RKD> is, then I think it breaks the proposal.

Please see section 5.1.2 ("Request-URI") of
draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-rev-03.txt.

Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: IPP> ADM - Results from the IPP Phone Conference 980617"
Previous message: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> ADM - Results from the IPP Phone Conference 980617"