IPP Mail Archive: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme

IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme

Roger K Debry (rdebry@us.ibm.com)
Wed, 17 Jun 1998 08:51:31 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Turner, Randy: "IPP> phone conference"
Next message: Randy Turner: "IPP> phone conference"
Previous message: James Walker: "Re: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme"
Next in thread: Jay Martin: "Re: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme"

In resposne to Randy's post ...

POST http://myhost.com:374/myprinter/myqueue HTTP/1.1
Host: myproxy.com:374
Content-type: application/ipp
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

<RKD> Why would the Host line have the 374 port?

3. A full IPP URL (e.g., ipp://myhost.com/myprinter/myqueue)

<RKD> I don't understand why this would be required. If it
<RKD> is, then I think it breaks the proposal.

=

Next message: Turner, Randy: "IPP> phone conference"
Next message: Randy Turner: "IPP> phone conference"
Previous message: James Walker: "Re: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme"
Next in thread: Jay Martin: "Re: IPP> Proposal for new IPP scheme"