IPP Mail Archive: IPP> Re: On the harm of adding new methods

IPP> Re: On the harm of adding new methods

Roger K Debry (rdebry@us.ibm.com)
Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:34:12 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> Re: On the harm of adding new methods"
Previous message: Peter Michalek: "RE: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Next in thread: Ira Mcdonald x10962: "Re: IPP> Re: On the harm of adding new methods"

But will the content-type be ok in both directions? What is the
content-type of an ipp response? If it is not also application/ipp,
then you could easily create a situation in which the request can be
sent and pass through the filter, but the response cannot...

<RKD> What would prevent the response from passing?

<RKD> What is the Alternative? If we use the PRINT method on a request=
,
<RKD> what is the response?

Next message: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> Re: On the harm of adding new methods"
Previous message: Peter Michalek: "RE: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Next in thread: Ira Mcdonald x10962: "Re: IPP> Re: On the harm of adding new methods"