IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> MOD - A couple of POSITIVE things about an "ipp" scheme

RE: IPP> MOD - A couple of POSITIVE things about an "ipp" scheme

Josh Cohen (joshco@microsoft.com)
Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:37:04 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Josh Cohen: "RE: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?"
Previous message: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?"

Minor correction.
this draft is the positive arguments for NOT using POST.
>
> If you want the positive arguments for using POST vs. PRINT,
> please check
> back on Josh Cohen's I-D at:
>
http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cohen-http-ext-postal-00.txt

Carl-Uno

Carl-Uno Manros
Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com

Next message: Josh Cohen: "RE: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?"
Previous message: Carl-Uno Manros: "Re: IPP> Why must IPP be transport-independent?"