I would be very interested in tunneling SNMP OID's through IPP for
printer management. It seems like a very reasonable concept to do and
it could allow for the enabling of millions of printers in existence
today. I'd like to see you continue your effort within IPP.
I am still a proponent that IPP was intended to become a universal,
catch-all printing protocol - which is why I am not on the SDP mailing
list. By definition of "Server-to-Device", it would seem as if the
client is already being left out. I could have sworn that some people
within the IPP WG were trying to limit the number of protocols that
needed to be implemented....
Kris Schoff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SISAACSON@novell.com [SMTP:SISAACSON@novell.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 1998 1:58 PM
> To: kschoff@hpb18423.boi.hp.com
> Subject: Re: IPP> ADM - Reminder about job openings and home work
> assignments
>
> Message-Id: <s53df244.076@novell.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 13:35:23 -0600
> Subject:
> Sender:
> Non-HP-SISAACSON/HP-Boise_mimegw7////////HPMEXT1/SISAACSON#a#novell#f#
> com@hpbs1480
> FROM:
> Non-HP-SISAACSON/HP-Boise_mimegw7////////HPMEXT1/SISAACSON#a#novell#f#
> com@hpbs1480
> TO: cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com,
> ipp@pwg.org
> Encoding: 17 text
>
>
> >>> Carl-Uno Manros <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com> 04/22 11:23 AM >>>
> > (snip)
> >HOME WORK ASSIGNMENTS
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > 4) Revised draft on getting MIB info over IPP - Uncertain whether
> this is
> > still part of IPP or should be part of the SDP discussion? (Scott
> I.)
>
> Unless this is still part of an IPP discussion, then I am not
> interested in
> participating. I plan to rev the document and post and an I-D (non-WG
> draft if necessary), but I would like for it to be a WG draft.
>
> Scott
>