Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Kugler [SMTP:kugler@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 1998 9:22 AM
To: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: IPP> IPP, independently of HTTP, Requires
Chunking ? Was: Mi
> The concrete transport/encoding IPP protocol document is VERY
dependent
> on HTTP chunking.
I still don't get it. Could you please explain?
The original statement is:
> Encoding is HTTP independent except for chinking.
This sentence, to me, implies that there is some aspect of the
IPP encoding,
apart from HTTP, that depends on chunking. This is suprising
news to me.
The only chunking-related requirements I've found in the
Protocol document are:
1) the Server must support "chunked" Transfer-Encoding of
Requests
2) the Client must support "chunked" Responses.
These requirements derive directly from RFC 2068: "All HTTP/1.1
applications
MUST be able to receive and decode the "chunked" transfer
coding..."
Confused in Boulder,
Carl-III
ipp-owner@pwg.org on 04/14/98 05:34:03 PM
Please respond to ipp-owner@pwg.org
To: ipp@pwg.org
cc:
Subject: RE: IPP> Minutes from PWG IPP Meeting in Portland, OR -
Apri
The abstract IPP described in the model document is not
dependent on
HTTP chunking.
The concrete transport/encoding IPP protocol document is VERY
dependent
on HTTP chunking.
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Kugler [SMTP:kugler@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 1998 4:25 PM
To: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: IPP> Minutes from PWG IPP Meeting in
Portland, OR - Apri
> IPP is not transport neutral. Encoding is HTTP independent
except for
> chinking.
I assume you mean "chunking". In what way is IPP dependent on
HTTP chunking?
-Carl