Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Moore [SMTP:paulmo@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 4:16 PM
To: 'imcdonal@eso.mc.xerox.com'; jkm@underscore.com
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> MOD/PRO - simple proposal for providing
dictionary-like capability
As I said below - this was an informal consensus. Everybody I
spoke to about
it said that they thought that we would have to do XML to handle
things like
dictionaries, etc.
Yes it completely breaks compatability - this is why I raised
the issue as
strongly as I did. I still think that the Maui decision was
wrong (but that
is water under the bridge now).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: imcdonal@eso.mc.xerox.com
[SMTP:imcdonal@eso.mc.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 4:17 PM
> To: jkm@underscore.com; Paul Moore
> Cc: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IPP> MOD/PRO - simple proposal for providing
> dictionary-like capability
>
> Hi Jay and Paul,
>
> Yes, I'm interested to hear more about the 'decision' to do
> IPPv2 on XML in Maui. It sure didn't widely penetrate the
> mailing list for the rest of us people. And it sure TOTALLY
> breaks backward compatibility.
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald (High North)
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> [Jay's note]
> From ipp-owner@pwg.org Wed Apr 1 15:37:41 1998
> Return-Path: <ipp-owner@pwg.org>
> Received: from zombi (zombi.eso.mc.xerox.com) by
snorkel.eso.mc.xerox.com
> (4.1/XeroxClient-1.1)
> id AA19155; Wed, 1 Apr 98 15:37:40 EST
> Received: from alpha.xerox.com by zombi (4.1/SMI-4.1)
> id AA24661; Wed, 1 Apr 98 15:31:25 EST
> Received: from lists.underscore.com ([199.125.85.30]) by
alpha.xerox.com
> with SMTP id <52295(4)>; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 12:31:32 PST
> Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by
lists.underscore.com
> (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA16498 for
<imcdonal@eso.mc.xerox.com>; Wed,
> 1 Apr 1998 15:28:01 -0500 (EST)
> Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Wed, 1 Apr 1998
15:20:22 -0500
> Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) id
> PAA15724 for ipp-outgoing; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 15:20:09 -0500
(EST)
> Message-Id: <3522A16D.757A81B1@underscore.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 12:19:57 PST
> From: Jay Martin <jkm@underscore.com>
> Organization: Underscore, Inc.
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; I)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> To: Paul Moore <paulmo@microsoft.com>
> Cc: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IPP> MOD/PRO - simple proposal for providing
dictionary-like
> capability
> References:
>
<5CEA8663F24DD111A96100805FFE6587030BC41B@red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: ipp-owner@pwg.org
> Status: R
>
> Paul,
>
> Sorry, but I wasn't able to attend the Maui meeting, so
perhaps
> you can clarify something about the perceptions of "IPP v2"
> for me.
>
> The way I read your message (below), IPP v2 will have a
totally
> different encoding than IPP v1 (ie, non-standard BER-like
> quasi-binary encoding vs. structured text).
>
> Is this correct?
>
> ...jay
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com
-- > -- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000-- > -- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699-- > -- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------