Who couldn't I persuade - Xerox, IBM, Canon, Sharp, Novell.... I had this
discussion on the first day I attended a WG meeting - 'we need two things,
something to provide high level features for users on the Internet,
something to fix the 'LPD sucks' problem'. I continued to state this every
time I was asked. Eventually I got the message that this was not a welcome
topic, and still isn't.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Martin [SMTP:jkm@underscore.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 1998 2:53 PM
> To: ipp@pwg.org
> Cc: Paul Moore; 'Harry Lewis'
> Subject: IPP> Does the world need a robust host-to-device network
> printing protocol?
>
> Paul Moore wrote in the "Submission vs. Monitoring and Management"
> thread:
>
> > Now if somebody wants to have a separate debate about writing a really
> > robust protocol for interfacing to printers (and I mean the real
> hardware
> > not some logical abstraction) then that will suit me fine. Lets start a
> new
> > track and call it, say, NLS (Not LPD and SNMP). This is what I initially
> > wanted to do but could not persuade enough people.
>
> Paul, what people were you unable to persuade? Internal Microsoft
> folks, or PWG folks, or both or what?
>
> For fear of sounding as if I'm beating a dead horse to death:
>
> Enterprise environments desparately need a fully functional
> host-to-device protocol for network printing.
>
> Am I alone in this belief??? (I know for a fact I am NOT along.)
>
> Will others in the PWG share their views using this new thread?
> If this belief turns out to be a minority view, then I'd certainly
> like to know (so I can drop the subject once and for all, if so).
>
> ...jay
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
> -- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
> -- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
> -- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------