IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Notifications

RE: IPP> Notifications

Carl Kugler (kugler@us.ibm.com)
Thu, 5 Feb 1998 11:11:09 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ron Bergman: "Re: IPP> Consensus on sending our drafts to the IESG"
Previous message: Xavier D. Riley: "Re: IPP> Consensus on sending our drafts to the IESG"

But... Proxies don't open up TCP or UDP pipes. Proxies pass nothing th=
rough.
Everything gets pulled up to the application level and then resent. Mu=
ch more
secure that way.

Also, note that very few corporate firewalls are configured to let NFS
through. That's partly because NFS is UDP-based and can't be securely
controlled.

-Carl

ipp-owner@pwg.org on 02/04/98 08:17:53 PM
Please respond to ipp-owner@pwg.org @ internet
To: masinter@parc.xerox.com @ internet
cc: ipp@pwg.org @ internet
Subject: RE: IPP> Notifications

I am speaking about our specific installation of Checkpoint Firewall-1,=

from which Cisco and a number of other vendors have licensed technology=

Next message: Ron Bergman: "Re: IPP> Consensus on sending our drafts to the IESG"
Previous message: Xavier D. Riley: "Re: IPP> Consensus on sending our drafts to the IESG"