IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Notifications

RE: IPP> Notifications

Josh Cohen (joshco@microsoft.com)
Tue, 3 Feb 1998 15:28:10 -0800

I thought the consensus that the first step was to have
a requirements document written up for IPP.
Since there are many generalized notification efforts
underway ( or soon to be), we can judge the suitability
of using one of them or writing one specific to IPP.
However, that can only be done if we know our requirements
first.

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Paul Moore
-> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 1998 1:05 PM
-> To: 'Turner, Randy'; 'ipp@pwg.org'
-> Subject: RE: IPP> Notifications
->
->
-> The minutes dont really discuss it. There is talk about email vs 'IPP
-> notifications' But no real discussion of how IPP
-> notification could be done.
-> A device-level protocol that does not allow Out of band
-> feedback seems
-> pretty broken
->
-> > -----Original Message-----
-> > From: Turner, Randy [SMTP:rturner@sharplabs.com]
-> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 1998 11:29 AM
-> > To: Paul Moore; 'ipp@pwg.org'
-> > Subject: RE: IPP> Notifications
-> >
-> >
-> > Yes, this was discussed. Several solutions were proposed.
-> Check out the
-> > minutes of the IPP meeting that Don just posted.
-> > I think some of the ideas were included in the minutes.
-> >
-> > Randy
-> >
-> >
-> > -----Original Message-----
-> > From: Paul Moore [SMTP:paulmo@microsoft.com]
-> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 1998 10:51 AM
-> > To: 'ipp@pwg.org'
-> > Subject: IPP> Notifications
-> >
-> > Has anybody noticed that IPP will be useless for notifications
-> > due to the
-> > asymmetry of the protocol? As currently constituted a printer
-> > cannot send an
-> > unsolicted message to anybody.
-> >
-> > Was this discussed later on on the Thursday brainstorm?
->