IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Processing Algorithm

Re: IPP> Processing Algorithm

Scott Lawrence (lawrence@agranat.com)
Fri, 21 Nov 1997 10:55:47 -0500

>>>>> "JM" == Jay Martin <jkm@underscore.com> writes:

JM> If IPP allows multiple posts (requests) in which the client is
JM> expecting to receive multiple responses, then IPP should be
JM> clearly defined to do one (and only one) of the following:

JM> a) Ensure the order of responses is *exactly* in the same
JM> order as the requests, or

You don't have any other alternative if you are running over HTTP.

--
Scott Lawrence           EmWeb Embedded Server       <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.        Engineering            http://www.agranat.com/

Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy