Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl-Uno Manros [SMTP:cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 1997 4:59 PM
> To: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: IPP> MOD & PRO - Security terminology
>
>
> Randy and other looking at improving our text on security,
>
> In our earlier discussions, we have loosely spoken about "secure" and
> "insecure" URIs for IPP etc. I suggest that we need to come up with
> better
> terms for the actual text in the draft documents, such as:
>
> HTTP URI: TLS URI:
>
> Basic security Enhanced security
> Simple security Advanced security
>
> What I want to avoid is to call the first case "insecure" or
> "non-secure"
> as it contains the case where RFC 2069 is used, which by many is
> considered
> to be enough of security for a particular IPP printer.
>
> Carl-Uno
> Carl-Uno Manros
> Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
> 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
> Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
> Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com