I think we agreed that JOBs could have descriptive attributes
(either single- or multi-valued??) about the associated
document(s), which apply unless (in a future version of IPP)
they are overridden at the (future) DOCUMENT object level.
I speculate that the following JOB level attributes are
necessary or desirable in IPP 1.0:
[job]document-name
[job]document-URI (to support Send-URI)
[job]document-format
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald (outside consultant at Xerox)
High North In
906-494-2434
------------------------------- Randy's note ---------------
Return-Path: <ipp-owner@pwg.org>
Received: from zombi (zombi.eso.mc.xerox.com) by snorkel.eso.mc.xerox.com (4.1/XeroxClient-1.1)
id AA11312; Sat, 20 Sep 97 13:58:49 EDT
Received: from alpha.xerox.com by zombi (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA01334; Sat, 20 Sep 97 13:54:50 EDT
Received: from lists.underscore.com ([199.125.85.31]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <52883(5)>; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 10:54:53 PDT
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA29820 for <imcdonal@eso.mc.xerox.com>; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:51:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:49:11 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA29489 for ipp-outgoing; Sat, 20 Sep 1997 13:40:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <D10983CAC30DD111B41400805FA6A1C1026CF7@admsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com>
From: "Turner, Randy" <rturner@sharplabs.com>
To: "'ipp@pwg.org'" <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: IPP> Document attributes
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 10:38:56 PDT
X-Priority: 3
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: ipp-owner@pwg.org
Status: R
I know we agreed not to have any document attributes but isn't
"document-format-attribute" a document attribute?
Randy