IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?

Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?

papowell@astart.com
Wed, 17 Sep 1997 08:22:32 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ira Mcdonald x10962: "IPP> RFC 2184 language tags for parameter values"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> MOD - ISSUES: Contents of "document-format" attribute = MIME"

> From rturner@sharplabs.com Tue Sep 16 15:49:16 1997
> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 15:23:12 -0700
> From: Randy Turner <rturner@sharplabs.com>
> To: ipp@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?
>
> PAPowell wrote:
> ..snip..
> >The LPRng interface quite happily delivers errors.
> >And note that it is free, compiles and runs on just about any UNIX system
> >with TCP/IP networking, and there is even an NT port (Don't ask, it wasn't
> >pretty).
>
> The context of our LPR/LPD gateway has been constrained on the widely
> deployed version that come shipped with Sun, HP, IBM, and other Unix
> boxes, which is more or less based on RFC 1179 (with vendor extensions)
> and for which the line mode interface I was referring to is the predominant
> interface.

Are you saying that it will ONLY work with these versions and the vendor specific
(and undocumented...) extensions? Or am I missing something here?
Not trying to be sarcastic, just trying to find out the basic intent.

Patrick

Next message: Ira Mcdonald x10962: "IPP> RFC 2184 language tags for parameter values"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> MOD - ISSUES: Contents of "document-format" attribute = MIME"