IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?

Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?

Randy Turner (rturner@sharplabs.com)
Tue, 16 Sep 1997 15:23:12 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> MOD - ISSUES: Contents of "document-format" attribute = MIME"
Previous message: papowell@astart.com: "Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?"

PAPowell wrote:
..snip..
>The LPRng interface quite happily delivers errors.
>And note that it is free, compiles and runs on just about any UNIX system
>with TCP/IP networking, and there is even an NT port (Don't ask, it wasn't
>pretty).

The context of our LPR/LPD gateway has been constrained on the widely
deployed version that come shipped with Sun, HP, IBM, and other Unix
boxes, which is more or less based on RFC 1179 (with vendor extensions)
and for which the line mode interface I was referring to is the predominant
interface. I don't think any other implementation is worth considering at this
point, given the amount of mapping we have to do just to this particular
version. If we take on other shareware version of LPR/LPD, we could be
here awhile; there are a bunch of 'em, for all platforms.

Randy

Next message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> MOD - ISSUES: Contents of "document-format" attribute = MIME"
Previous message: papowell@astart.com: "Re: IPP>MOD What if we had both Job-Id and Job-URI for Jobs?"