IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Job-URI discussion

Re: IPP> Job-URI discussion

Jim Walker (walker@dazel.com)
Tue, 09 Sep 1997 15:06:36 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Walker: "Re: IPP> Job-URI vs. Job-Id: How would you handle moving jobs?"
Previous message: Peter Zehler: "IPP> Issues from the TES sub-group"
Maybe in reply to: Randy Turner: "IPP> Job-URI discussion"
Next in thread: Tom Hastings: "Re: IPP> Job-URI discussion"

I personally feel that the Job-URL (sic) is the *only* way to go.
specific printer is immediately broken. The existing URL model
can be supported in my existing client environment, whereas the
proposed <printer-URL, job-ID> model would be a severe obstacle.
In our environment, a job is an object in and of itself; it may
be easily moved from one printer to another.

so there...
...walker

--
Jim Walker <walker@dazel.com>
System Architect/DAZEL Wizard
DAZEL Corporation, Austin, TX

Next message: Jim Walker: "Re: IPP> Job-URI vs. Job-Id: How would you handle moving jobs?"
Previous message: Peter Zehler: "IPP> Issues from the TES sub-group"
Maybe in reply to: Randy Turner: "IPP> Job-URI discussion"
Next in thread: Tom Hastings: "Re: IPP> Job-URI discussion"