> the author misrepresents the fact that Printer MIB Interpreter Languages
> are enumerated in the MIB and registered with IANA (on recommendation of
> the IETF) to support knowledge of the CAPABILITIES and default configuration
> of the printer - especially the notion of a default PDL for a print "channel"
> or a means of printing to the device.
Since you must be speaking from some better knowledge of the situation,
can you give any examples of clients that actually use the Printer MIB
Interpreter Languages to make some useful decision (as opposed to, say,
just displaying the information)?
Regards,
Larry
-- http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter