IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests

Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests

Carl-Uno Manros (carl@manros.com)
Thu, 17 Jul 1997 20:27:22 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Randy Turner: "Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Previous message: JK Martin: "Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Moore: "IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Next in thread: Randy Turner: "Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"

At 10:06 PM 7/17/97 -0400, JK Martin wrote:
>Yes, it does appear that we have been in violent agreement all along,
>that everyone now believes the target job URI must be specified at the
>IPP protocol layer, regardless of the transport used.
>
>It also sounds like we have consensus in support of the proposal
>by Paul/Bob (that launched this interesting thread).
>
>If we could only resolve all IPP issues this quickly!
>
> ...jay
>

Hating to spoil the party, but is everybody now clear on which address
goes into the HTTP as server address? I am not!

Carl-Uno

Next message: Randy Turner: "Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Previous message: JK Martin: "Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Moore: "IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"
Next in thread: Randy Turner: "Re: IPP> Identifying jobs in requests"