OK or res-x, res-y
so that we have pix-x, pix-y, res-x, res-y
>
>If only res is indicated, then a client could assume square pixels.
>
>I think this is sufficiently straightfoward. Comment?
OK.
btw, there is a slightly different isssue with fax: pix-x will be specified,
but pix-y may not. In this case, you cannot assume pix-y and pix-x are
equal. Many fax machines are designed to scale the image if you send them
images longer than the page they are printing on.
>
>Andy
>
>
>>
>> IPP, FAX, and HTTP need to know about resolution of the recipient
>> device; I don't think we need three different ways to deal with it.
>>
>> Why not just be straightforward and specify resolution in two
>> directions as integers or rationals?
>>
>> Larry
>> --
>> http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter
>>
>
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>Andrew Mutz | email: andy_mutz@hp.com
>Internet Imaging Operation | Phone: +1 408 447 4439
>Internet Technology Group | Page: +1 800 607 9639
>11000 Wolfe Road 42UO |
>Cupertino, California, USA. | Radio: KF6FUT
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Joffe Email: njoffe@cisco.com
Software Engineer Voice: +1 (408) 527-7957
Voice Technology Engineering Fax: +1 (408) 527-3907
Cisco Systems
San Jose
------------------------------------------------------------------------