IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt

Re: IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt

Larry Masinter (masinter@parc.xerox.com)
Thu, 5 Jun 1997 19:31:12 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: IPP> PRO - A value-type field for the Protocol Spec proposal"
Previous message: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt"
Maybe in reply to: Andy Mutz: "IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt"
Next in thread: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt"

> None of these solutions solve the problem of the Printer's
> resolutions-supported attribute which, hopefully, tells the
> client exactly what resolutions the Printer supports without
> any extraneous values and without a complicated structure
> for the attribute.

I think this is the same problem fax has, though.
Why would a list of pairs of integers (x-res/y-res)
or integer & ratio (x-res, aspect ratio) have 'extraneous
values'? Or be a 'complicated structure'?

-- 
http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter

Next message: Larry Masinter: "Re: IPP> PRO - A value-type field for the Protocol Spec proposal"
Previous message: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt"
Maybe in reply to: Andy Mutz: "IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt"
Next in thread: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> Re: draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt"