IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job

Re: IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job

Scott Lawrence (lawrence@agranat.com)
Thu, 22 May 1997 14:21:13 -0400

At 05:21 PM 5/21/97 PDT, Larry Masinter wrote:

LM> I would assume that "print-job" was a good name for
LM> what it is that you're sending in submitting a job.

>>>>> "CM" == Carl-Uno Manros <cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com> writes:

CM> One of the parameters for application/ipp is intended to be the actual
CM> operation that you want the IPP server to execute. [...] So I
CM> think we are looking for for something more generic than
CM> "application/print-job".

CM> I see the "application/ipp" as a top level label for a number of related
CM> operation requests and responses [...]

I agree with Larrys original comment that 'application/ipp' is both
redundant and not very descriptive. From your response, I would
agree that 'application/print-operation' would be much better.

--
Scott Lawrence           EmWeb Embedded Server       <lawrence@agranat.com>
Agranat Systems, Inc.        Engineering            http://www.agranat.com/

Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy