IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job

Re: IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job

Robert Herriot (Robert.Herriot@Eng.Sun.COM)
Wed, 21 May 1997 15:52:06 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: JK Martin: "Re: IPP> Protocol encoding addition..."
Previous message: Keith Carter: "Fwd: RE: IPP> MOD - UPDATE FOR STATUS CODE KEYWORDS IN THE M"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job"
Next in thread: JK Martin: "Re: IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job"

> From masinter@parc.xerox.com Wed May 21 15:47:02 1997
>
>
> So I suggest renaming it: application/print-job. That is,
> an 'application/print-job' is a description of a job that the
> sender wants the recipient to print.
>

Because the application/ipp entity is used for all print operations,
it would be more accurate to call it application/print-operation.

Bob Herriot

Next message: JK Martin: "Re: IPP> Protocol encoding addition..."
Previous message: Keith Carter: "Fwd: RE: IPP> MOD - UPDATE FOR STATUS CODE KEYWORDS IN THE M"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job"
Next in thread: JK Martin: "Re: IPP> application/ipp vs. application/print-job"