IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> MOD - New Reference

Re: IPP> MOD - New Reference

Robert Herriot (Robert.Herriot@Eng.Sun.COM)
Mon, 14 Apr 1997 12:46:33 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Keith Moore: "IPP> Re: MOD - New Reference"
Previous message: Jim Walker: "Re: IPP> ADM - How is IPP a "compatible subset" of DPA?"
Maybe in reply to: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> MOD - New Reference"

Of late, I have been referring to the syntax in RFC 2068 which is
essentially RFC 822 with a few improvments.

Which should we use?

Bob Herriot

> From carl@manros.com Sat Apr 12 07:32:16 1997
> X-Sender: cumanros@pop3.holonet.net
> X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 07:30:39 -0700
> To: ipp@pwg.org
> From: Carl-Uno Manros <carl@manros.com>
> Subject: IPP> MOD - New Reference
> Sender: ipp-owner@pwg.org
> X-Lines: 13
>
> FYI,
>
> the drums WG in IETF has recently broken out the syntax part from RFC 822
> into a separate document, currently an I-D. We need to keep an eye on how
> this develops and potentially change our references when the new draft
> becomes an RFC and enters the standards track. The latest draft is:
>
> ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-drums-abnf-02.txt
>
> Regards,
>
> Carl-Uno
>
>

Next message: Keith Moore: "IPP> Re: MOD - New Reference"
Previous message: Jim Walker: "Re: IPP> ADM - How is IPP a "compatible subset" of DPA?"
Maybe in reply to: Carl-Uno Manros: "IPP> MOD - New Reference"