> I do not want the IPP Model to turn into a smallest common subset or
> union of all printing systems. I want it to be a "reasonable" view for all
> printing subsystems. I don't even think the right words are greatest
> common subset (since one trivial printing system brings the whole thing
> down into the mud). We, as participating companies, all have different
> markets with different types of customers, however, from the Novell
> perspective, we have found that 100 different values are TOO many. I
> am sure that we can satisfy over 95% of electronic distributed printing
> with only 3 values.
Scott, I agree with you entirely here on this critical top-level position.
How many others agree or disagree to this basic premise as proposed
by Scott?
We can cut out all kinds of issue-beating if we all first agree that we
MUST have something simple...or at least simpler than what is currently
proposed.
...jay