> >I support Scott's view. Let's keep moving down the path we are on -- get the >protocol right, >then do whatever mappings we think are appropriate as a second step. I don;t >think that we >could standardize on the Microsoft approach because they are passing >Microsoft >internal >data structures around. > > >Yes. but that's happenig only in one case, and it only contains user id and a >couple of other basic job properties. It would take me at most 15 minutes of >coding to change that structure to its IPP equivalent. > >Babak
Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy