IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios

Re: IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios

Carl-Uno Manros (cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Fri, 17 Jan 1997 10:10:51 PST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jim Walker: "IPP> Agenda for February Meeting ?"
Previous message: Scott A. Isaacson: "IPP> MOD - Model group telecon"
Maybe in reply to: rdebry@us.ibm.com: "IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios"
Next in thread: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios"

At 07:16 AM 1/17/97 PST, you wrote:
>Classification:
>Prologue:
>Epilogue:
>
>The following notes are in response to Jay's comments
>
>1) You suggested replacing PUSH and PULL with
>
> The protocol must support these sources of client print data
> - print data is a file
> - print data is being generated on the fly by an application
> - print data is referenced by a URL
>
>Answer: don't have a problem in stating the requirement this way. However,
>I'm not sure that we want to place getting a referenced file outside of the
>scope of IPP v1.0. I'd like some other comments on this.
>

I would certainly like to see the referenced file case covered on IPP v1.0.
At least for the cases where no special access rights are required, such as
if the file is open to everybody on the Internet, or if the file is in the
same domain behind a firewall. More complex cases will be dependent on how
much in the way of security we want to provide for IPP v1.0.

Carl-Uno

Next message: Jim Walker: "IPP> Agenda for February Meeting ?"
Previous message: Scott A. Isaacson: "IPP> MOD - Model group telecon"
Maybe in reply to: rdebry@us.ibm.com: "IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios"
Next in thread: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios"