<<KC>> We agree that modify job is an end-user task that is not
supported
<<KC>> in IPP 1.0. My only point is that in the context of this chart we
<<KC>> are listing a complete set of requirements for IPP as a whole
(e.g.
<<KC>> note the reference to "operator" and "administrator" on the
same
<<KC>> chart which are not supported in IPP 1.0) so my point is that in
that
<<KC>> context modify job is an overall requirement. We can then
clearly
<<KC>> show in the IPP 1.0 Objectives chart which end-user tasks are
<<KC>> supported (i.e. not modify job). Your thoughts?
<<SAI>> Perfect.
<<KC>> It sounds like that for IPP an "end-user" is authorized to use a
<<KC>> a specific printer object. There can be 0 or more "end-users"
per
<<KC>> printer object. If my understanding is correct, then we're in
synch.
<<KC>> Otherwise, please clarify.
<<SAI>> Perfect.
Scott