IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> IPP Internet-Draft

Re: IPP> IPP Internet-Draft

Robert Herriot (robert.herriot@Eng.Sun.COM)
Mon, 25 Nov 1996 18:22:57 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> IPP Internet-Draft"
Previous message: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> Re: New Internet-Draft Request [ job-state-reasons being empty]"
Maybe in reply to: Scott A. Isaacson: "IPP> IPP Internet-Draft"
Next in thread: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> IPP Internet-Draft"

Issue on line 1386:
2-sided-long-edge and 2-sided-short-edge work the same for
portrait or landscape. That is one of the nice things about
the concepts. On the other hand head-to-toe is tumble in
portrait but duplex in landscape. Head-to-head, likewise
switches.

Since the orientation attribute is for an entire document, I am not sure
that reverse-landscape has any value.

Bob Herriot

Next message: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> IPP Internet-Draft"
Previous message: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> Re: New Internet-Draft Request [ job-state-reasons being empty]"
Maybe in reply to: Scott A. Isaacson: "IPP> IPP Internet-Draft"
Next in thread: Robert Herriot: "Re: IPP> IPP Internet-Draft"