I agree. The PWG also agreed to add such an object to the Job Monitoring
MIB: jmGeneralCurrentNumberOfJobs.
Currently, the spec includes both pending/processing and completed jobs.
We should probably have two counters: one for pending/processing and
one for completed jobs.
One nit, should the pending/processing counter include the currently
processing job or not? I think yes, so that an idle printer has a distinct
value (0), from one that is processing only one job and there are no more
in the queue (1).
Tom