IFX Mail Archive: FW: IFX> PDF/is last call Question/Comment

FW: IFX> PDF/is last call Question/Comment

From: Rick Seeler (rseeler@adobe.com)
Date: Wed Jan 07 2004 - 16:48:16 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IFX> 14 Jan 1PM PST - next IFX meeting [reminder]"

    Whoops.... I forgot to send this to the reflector...

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Rick Seeler [mailto:rseeler@adobe.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:22 AM
    > To: 'thrasher@lexmark.com'
    > Subject: RE: IFX> PDF/is last call Question/Comment
    >
    > No, I don't believe so. Abode works on the process of: once someone
    > requests a license, the process is created/implemented. Since no one has
    > yet requested the license, it hasn't been created.
    >
    > -Rick
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: owner-ifx@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ifx@pwg.org] On Behalf Of
    > > thrasher@lexmark.com
    > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:56 AM
    > > To: ifx@pwg.org
    > > Subject: IFX> PDF/is last call Question/Comment
    > >
    > > The Patent Clarification section provided by Adobe (page 36, lines
    > > 1079-1082) indicates that
    > > a "process" is/will be defined by Adobe or the PWG in either the CS or
    > STD
    > > to request the RF
    > > license from Adobe for essential IP claims.......
    > >
    > > I didn't see the process detailed in the draft.. Has this process been
    > > defined yet...?
    > >
    > > Jerry Thrasher
    > > Lexmark Intenational Inc.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 07 2004 - 16:48:43 EST