Gail,
Thanks for a very concise summary.
One small proposed edit.
"Should we also allow Profile 2? Profile 2 is a combination of Profile 1
and Profile 4….Go ahead and add it."
Should read:
"Should we also allow Profile 2? Profile 2 allows much greater flexibility
than Profile 1 and may be considered the Huffman counter part to Profile 4,
with less complexity….Go ahead and add it."
Thanks,
Lloyd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ifx@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ifx@pwg.org]On Behalf Of Gail Songer
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 3:11 PM
To: Gail Songer; ifx@pwg.org
Subject: IFX> Conf Call May 7
Next Meeting May 21, 1-3PM Pacific
Ira
Dennis
Rick
Lloyd
Gail
Review of PDF/is spec:
(3.1) Fonts allowed but only for invisible text. (No font data is
embedded)
Encryption has been removed.
No Gray color space (no release from HP); use index into sRGB (alignment
with latest PDF). sRGB and the indexed color space must be included in all
PDF/is docs
Digital signatures will be allowed by PDF/a.
Table 3-2: rearranged and reworded.
Sec 4.3 JBIG2Decode Filter: allow profile 3 (T.89) Because 3 is a subset
of 4 which we already allowed. Should we also allow Profile 2? Profile 2 is
a combination of Profile 1 and Profile 4….Go ahead and add it.
Sec 4.4 is YUV a valid color space? It’s legal for JPEG and
should be the RECOMMENDED type.
IPP Fax Protocol spec
Section 6.6: How do we want the string to appear? PDF/is-1.0
(Tom Would you add this value to your spec?)
6.6 documents-format-version-supported – Allow any flavor of
PDF.
Restart section at 9.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gail Songer
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 4:09 PM
To: ifx@pwg.org
Subject: IFX> Conference Call
Should IPP Fax allow any form of PDF beside PDF/is? See the issues around
the topic below
Next call, Wednesday April 30 at 1PM Pacific.
Lee Farrell
Tom Hastings
Rick Seeler
Dennis Carney
Gail Songer
Ira McDonald
ICC profile – no progress
Notifications – no progress
pwg_letter-or-A4 – no progress
pdl-override – lots of discussion on the IPP reflector. No resolution
yet.
digital-signature – in Document-object spec.
The document-object spec may get bogged down. Need to keep tabs on it’s
progress; we may need to reconsider our dependence on that spec if it looks
like it will take longer to finish last call than we are willing to wait.
document-format-version - should it be used in Get-Printer-Attributes
(should you be able to color on it? TomH)? (Ira doesn’t want it)
Ira would like to take out document-format-version and
document-format-version-supported. Messy conformance requirements because we
are requiring only a small part of the document-object spec and the
document-object may not be as close to completion as previously thought.
However, we had wanted IPPFax to allow other flavors of PDF and therefore
would need to be able to specify what versions and you might not have access
to an IPP port.
Start next meeting: Section 7
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 07 2003 - 18:21:13 EDT