So Don is suggesting that the PDF/is standard which is also a document
format standard could be also numbered in the 5102 series along with the two
XHTML/Print document format standards (5102.1 and 5102.2) when we assign a
PWG IEEE-ISTO number to PDF/is.
Comments?
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: don@lexmark.com [mailto:don@lexmark.com]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 06:02
To: Hastings, Tom N
Cc: Lewis, Harry
Subject: RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard
Tom:
The documents (and their full titles) are available from
http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/HTML-Version/XHTML-Print.html
http://www.pwg.org/xhtml-print/HTML-Version/CSS-Print.html
I think making the 5102 series be document formats makes sense.
**********************************************
Don Wright don@lexmark.com
Chair, IEEE SA Standards Board
Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
Director, Alliances & Standards
Lexmark International
740 New Circle Rd
Lexington, Ky 40550
859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************
"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> on 03/13/2003 05:28:42 PM
To: don@lexmark.com
cc: "Lewis, Harry" <harryl@us.ibm.com>, "Hastings, Tom N"
<hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
Subject: RE: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard
Don,
That is what I remembered, so 5102.1 and 5102.2 sound OK?
What are the full titles of each?
We (or your WG) can decide later whether the 5102 series is for any PWG
document format, such as PDF/is, or just for XHTML-like stuff or just for
XML-related document formats or whatever, right?
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: don@lexmark.com [mailto:don@lexmark.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:58
To: Hastings, Tom N
Cc: Lewis, Harry
Subject: Re: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard
Just a reminder that the XHTML-Print group has TWO documents at Proposed
Standard Status so we need two numbers.
**********************************************
Don Wright don@lexmark.com
Chair, IEEE SA Standards Board
Member, IEEE-ISTO Board of Directors
f.wright@ieee.org / f.wright@computer.org
Director, Alliances & Standards
Lexmark International
740 New Circle Rd
Lexington, Ky 40550
859-825-4808 (phone) 603-963-8352 (fax)
**********************************************
"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>@pwg.org on 03/13/2003
03:22:42 PM
Sent by: owner-pwg@pwg.org
To: "Lewis, Harry" <harryl@us.ibm.com>
cc: pwg@pwg.org
Subject: PWG> PWG IEEE-ISTO number for Proposed XHTML/Print standard
Harry,
Per the discussion today at the SM telecon on PWG process about standards
numbers and what to do about allocating a PWG number for the Proposed PWG
XHTML/Print standard as requested by Don for the W3C.
In order to give Don a PWG number for the XHTML/Print Proposed PWG
Standard,
the next series of numbers not yet used is 5102.n.
Currently, Proposed PWG standards have the following numbers:
5100.1, 5100.2, 5100.3, 5100.4 ... for IPP
5101.1 for the Media Standardized Names
So how about 5102.1 for XHTML/Print. If there are several documents,
5102.1
and 5102.2
ISSUE: How to number future standards? We can decide later how to
allocate
numbers for:
PWG Semantic Model
Print Services Interface
IPPFAX
PDF/is
etc.
Is the 5102 series for document formats, so that PDF/is would go in that
series?
Should IPPFAX go in its own series, or should it be in the IPP 5100.n
series?
Should PWG Semantic Model be in its own series?
Should PSI be in its own series?
Or is there some common theme that would help put some of these in the same
series.
ISSUE: Separate isssue is what happens when the Proposed/Candidate
Standard
reaches Standard?
Does it get a new number or use the same number? If a new number could it
be some algorithm from its original number, such as adding 50. So 5150.2
would be the Standard version of Proposed standard 5100.2.
Tom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:55:50 EST