I've updated the UIF spec to contain modifications suggested by attendees of
the Aug. 1 Toronto face-to-face meeting, the Aug 17 telecon, and by Lloyd
McIntyre who co-authored the TIFF-FX spec.
changes from version 0.6 to 0.7 noted:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/uif-spec-07-rev.doc
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/uif-spec-07-rev.pdf
clean:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/uif-spec-07.doc
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/uif-spec-07.pdf
The UIF issues that were raised prior to and during the Toronto meeting (see
the minutes:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/minutes/IPPFAX-0108-minutes.doc) have all
been resolved.
There is one new outstanding issue:
-- Is it still OK for a Sender to describe UIF Profile S or F TIFF data
using the "image/tiff" MIME subtype since UIF Profile S relies on several
TIFF-FX extensions which require the use of two TIFF fields not recognized
by TIFF 6 (namely, the GlobalParametersIFD and TIFF-FXExtensions fields)
John Pulera
------------------------------------
John Pulera
jpulera@minolta-mil.com
Minolta Systems Laboratory
111 Innovation Dr., Ste 200
Irvine, CA 92612
(949)737-4520 x348
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 18 2001 - 04:00:11 EDT