Jim-san
We designed that the IFAX header is similer as G3 header.
The IFAX header consists of date, time,mail address of transmitter and page
number.
One of reason that fax header is send as image form is character font
converting to image.
The receiver could not print the information form transmitter
when Japanese characters are send from the transmitter in the information.
I know that the user may not understand the Japanese characters in the
image header.
Regards,
Toru Maeda
At 08:49 01/02/05 -0500, Jim Dahmen wrote:
>Maeda-san,
>
>When sending a T.37 message, isn't the header information of the email the
>same as the information sent in the header of the fax message?
>I realize that it is not in the body of the message as the fax header, but
>the same information is provided, i.e. when it was sent and who it came
>from. I know that this information can be faked, but so can the information
>from a fax device.
>
>Just a thought.
>
>Best regards,
>Jim Dahmen
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ifx@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ifx@pwg.org]On Behalf
> > Of MAEDA toru
> > Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 2:17 AM
> > To: Wagner,William; ifx@pwg.org
> > Subject: RE: IFX> Legal Requirements on Classic fax
> >
> >
> > Bill-san
> >
> > Yes, FCC Part68 only mention about Telephone connected fax.
> > There was no legal requirement before junk fax has become
> > popular in G3 fax.
> >
> > Can you imagine that ifax users get many printed SPAM mail
> > and junk fax
> > which cost some cents per page.
> > User will ask to stop printing such useless junk fax.
> > Sending date/stamping header may prevent junk IFAX.
> > So supporting Part68 for ifax is very important not only for
> > user but also
> > manufacturer.
> >
> > Some T.37 fax machine supports fax date/stamping header same
> > header as of
> > Classic fax,
> > I am proposing T.37 Terminal Mode which mandates
> > date/stamping, in IETF.
> >
> > Regrads,
> >
> > Toru Maeda
> >
> > At 15:20 01/02/04 -0500, Wagner,William wrote:
> > >Maeda-san,
> > >
> > >Many thanks for this input. I think this raises a very
> > important question
> > >for IPP-FAX. The PART 68 requirement is very specific to
> > Telephone facsimile
> > >machines, and applicability to Internet facsimile is not
> > obvious. Indeed,
> > >PART 68 is only applicable to telephone communications and interface.
> > >
> > >So far as I can see, T.37 has no mention of date/stamping,
> > other than a
> > >requirement that offramp gateways "Ensure that local legal
> > requirements
> > >relating to facsimile transmissions are met". This again applies to
> > >telephone connections.
> > >
> > >Have any date/stamping practices been established for T.37
> > implementations
> > >in anticipation of legal requirements being set?
> > >
> > >Thank you.
> > >
> > >Bill Wagner
> > >NetSilicon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: MAEDA toru [mailto:maeda.toru@canon.co.jp]
> > >Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 10:03 PM
> > >To: ifx@pwg.org
> > >Subject: IFX> Legal Requirements on Clasic fax
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Attached is the legal requirements on classic fax in FCC68,
> > >during the discussion at Maui meeting.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >
> > >Toru MAEDA
> > >CANON Inc.
> > >
> > >
> > >[Code of Federal Regulations]
> > >[Title 47, Volume 3, Parts 40 to 69]
> > >[Revised as of October 1, 1998]
> > > From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
> > >[CITE: 47CFR68.318]
> > >
> > >[Page 338]
> > >
> > > TELECOMMUNICATION
> > >
> > > CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION--(CONTINUED)
> > >
> > >PART 68--CONNECTION OF TERMINAL EQUIPMENT TO THE TELEPHONE
> > NETWORK--Table
> > >of Contents
> > >
> > > Subpart D--Conditions for Registration
> > >
> > >Sec. 68.318 Additional limitations.
> > > (d) Telephone facsimile machines; Identification of
> > the sender of
> > >the message. It shall be unlawful for any person within the United
> > >States to use a computer or other electronic device to send
> > any message
> > >via a telephone facsimile machine unless such message
> > clearly contains,
> > >in a margin at the top or bottom of each transmitted page or on the
> > >first page of the transmission, the date and time it is sent and an
> > >identification of the business, other entity, or individual
> > sending the
> > >message and the telephone number of the sending machine or of such
> > >business, other entity, or individual. Telephone facsimile machines
> > >manufactured on and after December 20, 1992, must clearly mark such
> > >identifying information on each transmitted message.
> > >
> > >
> > >--------------------
> > >MAEDA TORU
> > >MIE Development Div. 2
> > >CANON Inc.
> > >--------------------
> >
> > -----------------------------------
> > $B%-%d%N%s3t<02q<R(B
> > $B1GA|;vL35!(BMIE$B?d?J%;%s%?!<(B
> > $B1GA|;vL35!(BMIE$BBh#23+H/It(B
> > $BA0ED!!E0(B
> > 146-8501$B!!El5~ETBgED6h2<4];R#3!]#3#0!]#2(B
> > $BEEOC!!(B03-3757-9738$B!"(BFAX$B!!(B03-3757-8205
> > -----------------------------------
--------------------
MAEDA TORU
MIE Development Div. 2
CANON Inc.
--------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 05:22:48 EST