IFX Mail Archive: IFX> Re: IPP> Re: IPP> REG - Proposa

IFX> Re: IPP> Re: IPP> REG - Proposal for "job-recipient-name" Job Template attribute

From: Michael Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 13:39:56 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Sweet: "IFX> Re: IPP> ATT - Updated "job-recipient-name" spec from the 9/13 IPP WG meeting and an ISSUE"

    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
    >
    > Are you guys talking about receipt of event notifications or
    > receipt of the printed job output indicated as a Job object
    > attribute and banner page text?

    Right now I'm more concerned with notification. As I've pointed
    out before, you can already do the "manual" specification of a
    recipient via a cover page. Just adding an attribute for the
    recipient doesn't automate things much - the notification will
    be the feature that will make it worthwhile.

    > If event notifications, what events (job held or job completed or
    > what?) and how is the event specified? Hopefully in some
    > Per-Printer or Per-Job Subscription.

    I'm thinking more along the lines of a per-printer (or in the case
    of CUPS, also a per-server) subscription so that you can be notified
    when a new job is created, processed, and/or completed (depending on
    what you use it for) and take the appropriate action.

    Per-job notifications would have to be initiated by the sender,
    which I think can be handled properly by the current spec without
    a new attribute...

    I guess the main change to the current notification scheme would be
    to allow for a filter of some sort (e.g. job-created-mine event)
    for per-printer subscriptions. Then you'd only receive notifications
    for jobs created by you or destined for you.

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 14:06:05 EDT

  • Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy