Now that IPP 1.1 is "in the can", the IPP WG is turning its attention to
Notification Requirements. This is a issue central to the QUALDOCS charter.
Any comments and suggestions would be appreciated as we begin to draft a
"Goals and Requirements document for this proposed WG.
##################
>From: "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
>To: ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
>Subject: IPP> NOT - Updated IPP Notification Requirements document posted
>Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:53:23 -0700
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
>Sender: owner-ipp@pwg.org
>
>I've down loaded the IPP Notification Requirements that correspond to the
>recently announced Internet-Draft (02). Harry Lewis had sent me his edits
>from the Philadelphia meeting when we reviewed the 00 version from February
>1998. I included my notes from the meeting and indicated things that we
>agreed are issues:
>
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/Internet-Drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-not-02.txt
>
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/draft-ietf-ipp-not-02.txt
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-notification-requirements-990624.d
>oc
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-notification-requirements-990624.p
>df
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-notification-requirements-990624-r
>ev.doc
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_NOT/ipp-notification-requirements-990624-r
>ev.pdf
>
>We will cover this requirements document at the telecon IPP telecon, this
>Wednesday, usual time 10-12 PDT (1-3 EDT). Please send any comments ahead
>of time to the ipp DL with NOT in the subject line.
>
>After sending it in to the Internet-Drafts in time (6/24) for the up coming
>IETF meeting, I discovered that Roger had actually published an 01 version
>as an Internet-Draft in March 1998. So one of the things that the 01
>version had added over the 00 version was Quality Of Service:
>
>
>2.16 Quality of Service
>Some notification delivery methods may allow users to select quality of
>service parameters. These will depend upon the specific delivery method
>chosen, and may include parameters such as priority, security, number of
>retries, and the like.
>
>We agreed in Philadelphia to add Quality Of Service, so we are moving a
>direction agreed to over a year ago.
>
>So adding the above is a first set of comments on the requirements document.
>
>Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63119
Voice 314.918.9020
Fax 314.918.9015
INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey@ix.netcom.com
eFAX 815.333.1237
MediaGate iPost VoiceMail and Fax 800.260.4464
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<