IFX Mail Archive: Re: Charter Bashing II

Re: Charter Bashing II

Richard Shockey (rshockey@ix.netcom.com)
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:30:42 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard Shockey: "RE: Questions to be addressed..."
Previous message: Richard Shockey: "Re: Charter Bashing II"

At 08:37 AM 3/24/1999 -0700, Nick Webb wrote:
>
>>>The transmission and reception of non-alterable documents is an
>>essential >communications medium.
>>
>>How crucial is this idea of "non-alterable"? Should this even be an
>>issue, let alone a charter constraint?
>
>IMHO for this to be used in the same way as f*x, this is a requirement. You
>can't send a contract to a client only to have the client change the
>contract on you.

That is what I was trying to convey .. any language suggestion here?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63119
Voice 314.918.9020
Fax 314.918.9015
INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey@ix.netcom.com
eFAX 815.333.1237
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Next message: Richard Shockey: "RE: Questions to be addressed..."
Previous message: Richard Shockey: "Re: Charter Bashing II"