Hi Rick,
Specifically what other time slots work for you, please?
We'll never successfully stay out-of-sync with your other telecon.
And we have other work to do - like review of my soon-to-be-posted
Counter MIB v2 spec - and non-CIM approaches to Web Services
management of printers (e.g., specifically targeted at the Windows
Vista platforms via WS-Devices, as Craig has suggested).
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of Richard_Landau at Dell.com
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:00 PM
To: Whittle, Craig; wims at pwg.org
Subject: RE: WIMS> CIM - Teleconference postponed - Please review proposal for scope reduction
Yes, I will post something to try to explain the directoin.
Moving the telecon one week puts it in phase with another that I have recently acquired in the same time slot. I was/am hoping to keep them out of phase on two-week cycles so that I can attend both without having to reschedule either. Can we move the next meeting two weeks instead, or investigate another nearby slot? I apologize for having to suggest such a disruption.
rick
_____
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Whittle, Craig
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 11:20
To: wims at pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> CIM - Teleconference postponed - Please review proposal for scope reduction
All:
Bill has faithfully sent out agendas / meeting reminders to the e-mail reflector prior to each teleconference. Ira reminded me this morning that Bill was out this week and that I should have sent an agenda earlier this week. Since we are "taking a step back" as Lee pointed out in our last teleconference to consider the new requirements form CIM Core, I propose that we pick up our discussion as an e-mail thread or in our next teleconference on April 5th.
Rick:
Can you post your proposal to "reduce_scope_of_update" to the ftp server and send out a link to the reflector for review?
If you would like additional background on the issue and proposals, please refer to last week's minutes (see HYPERLINK "ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/minutes/cim_070322.pdf"ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/minutes/cim_070322.pdf).
Best regards,
**CW
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.20/736 - Release Date: 3/27/2007 4:38 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20070329/055a8fb7/attachment.html